Right, back and fed. Well, the temple articles are mentioned in the texts that talk about the fall of Jerusalem to Nebuchadnezzar, along with its earlier sacking by the same (2 Kings 24:13; 25:14, 15; 2 Chron. 36:7, 10, 18-19). Then in the accounts of the return from exile they feature very prominently as well (Ezra 1:7-11; 5:13-15). To the Babylonians this stuff was war booty, but to the Jews of the return they were sacred things, essential for worship. It was scandalous and shameful in their minds that they had fallen into pagan hands. It was a key part of the restoration of worship to return them to service. It was a setback when, near the end of Nehemiah, the temple rooms intended for the storage of such sacred articles ended up storing Tobiah the Ammonite’s personal gear (the same Hebrew word in each case, ‘kĕlî‘, Neh. 13:5, 8-9).
But the role the temple articles play in Daniel is also interesting. Their seizure by King Neb is mentioned in Dan. 1:2, and then they come back with a vengeance when in chapter 5, Belshazzar decides to use the temple cups and saucers (now the Aramaic term, ‘māʾn‘) to have a party in honour of the local gods – a double sacrilege. It’s clear that this double offence is the key to the sentence written on the wall plaster by the disembodied hand (5:23-24). Like precious articles, Belshazzar himself has been weighed on the scales (5:27), but hasn’t come up to scratch, and the Giver of Kingdoms decides that his has had its day.
So like the Ark, the articles of God are successfully confiscated by the conquering foreign king, but, like the forbidden fruit, to his own hurt, until the deliverer Cyrus (to call the book of Ezra back here) returns them to their rightful place.
Well, I thought it was interesting, anyway. Hadn’t noticed this before now in all those years of Bible reading.